D4.3 Climate change

SL & HL+ AHL sectionsSL and HL, with AHL content · Ecosystems · Theme D

Big questions

  • How do human emissions set off warming that can then feed itself?
  • What happens to species and ecosystems when the timing and places they depend on shift?

Sections framed in purple are AHL (Higher Level only). SL students can hide them in Display settings.

Human causes of climate change

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.1

The Earth’s surface is warmed by sunlight, and it would be far colder without the greenhouse effect. Climate change today is driven by anthropogenic (human-caused) increases in two greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide and methane.

The greenhouse effect and the enhanced greenhouse effect
Text description of this animation

A cross-section from space down to the Earth's surface. The Sun emits short-wave radiation that passes through the atmosphere; some is reflected by ice, but most is absorbed by the ground and oceans, warming them. The warm surface emits long-wave infrared radiation, drawn as wavy arrows. Some escapes to space, but molecules of carbon dioxide, methane, water vapour and nitrous oxide absorb infrared and re-emit it in all directions, including back towards the surface; this natural greenhouse effect keeps the surface warm enough for life. When more carbon dioxide and methane molecules are added, as CO₂ has risen from about 280 to about 425 ppm since 1750, more infrared is absorbed and re-emitted downwards and a thermometer shows the surface warming further. The last step shows the stratospheric ozone layer absorbing ultraviolet radiation: thinning of this layer by CFCs lets more UV reach the surface, but it is a separate problem and not the cause of global warming.

  1. Short-wave radiation from the Sun. The Sun emits mostly short-wave radiation (visible light, with some ultraviolet and near-infrared). Greenhouse gases absorb little of it, so most passes straight through the atmosphere. About 30% of incoming sunlight is reflected back to space by clouds, ice and other bright surfaces.
  2. The surface absorbs sunlight and warms. Land and oceans absorb most of the short-wave radiation that reaches them and convert it to heat. Dark surfaces such as open ocean and forest absorb more than white snow and ice, which reflect most of the light.
  3. The warmed surface emits long-wave infrared. The warm Earth radiates energy as long-wave infrared radiation (heat). If nothing absorbed it, this radiation would pass out to space and the average surface temperature would be about −18 °C.
  4. Greenhouse gases absorb and re-emit infrared. Molecules of carbon dioxide, methane, water vapour and nitrous oxide absorb infrared and re-emit it in all directions, so part of it returns to the surface. This natural greenhouse effect keeps the average surface temperature at about +15 °C, which is essential for life on Earth.
  5. The enhanced greenhouse effect. Human activities have raised CO₂ from about 280 ppm to about 425 ppm and more than doubled methane. With more greenhouse-gas molecules, less infrared escapes directly to space and more is re-emitted back down, so the surface and lower atmosphere warm until enough energy escapes again — global warming.
  6. Not the same as the ozone hole. Ozone in the stratosphere absorbs harmful ultraviolet radiation. CFCs thinned this layer, letting more UV reach the surface and raising the risk of skin cancer and cataracts. That is a different problem with a different cause; extra UV does not explain global warming, and the ozone layer is now slowly recovering.

Rising carbon dioxide and methane

Gas Before industrialization 2024 Main human sources
CO₂ about 280 ppm about 425 ppm (Mauna Loa) combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas); deforestation and land clearance (burning and decay of biomass); drainage and burning of peat
CH₄ about 0.72 ppm about 1.93 ppm ruminant livestock (methanogens in the rumen); flooded rice paddies and landfill (anaerobic decomposition); leaks from coal mines and gas wells

The CO₂ rise is the long-term trend in the Keeling curve (C4.2 Transfers of energy and matter). Natural processes balance in the long run: photosynthesis removes roughly as much CO₂ as respiration releases, and methane made by methanogens in wetlands is gradually oxidized in the atmosphere. Human activities add carbon from fossil stores faster than oceans and plants can absorb it.

Each molecule of methane absorbs far more infrared than CO₂: per kilogram it causes about 80 times as much warming over 20 years. It stays in the air for only about a decade, though, whereas much of the extra CO₂ persists for centuries, so CO₂ causes the larger share of warming.

Correlation, causation and the ice-core record

Schematic ice-core record of CO₂ and temperature over 800,000 yearsTwo stacked schematic curves for the last 800,000 years. Upper: atmospheric CO₂ from air bubbles in Antarctic ice, swinging between about 180 ppm in glacial periods and about 280 to 300 ppm in warm interglacials. Lower: temperature at the ice-core site, estimated from hydrogen isotopes, swinging over roughly 8 to 10 °C. The two curves rise and fall together, a positive correlation. An arrow on the right shows that today's CO₂, about 425 ppm, is far above anything in the record.CO₂ in trapped air bubbles (ppm)200250300today ≈ 425 ppm(off this scale)pre-industrial≈ 280 ppmTemperature at the site compared with recent (°C)-8-40warminterglacialglacial800,000600,000400,000200,000nowYears before present (schematic)
Schematic of the Antarctic ice-core record. CO₂ in trapped air and temperature (from hydrogen isotopes in the ice) rose and fell together through eight glacial cycles, never exceeding about 300 ppm; today's level is far above that range.

The two curves show a strong positive correlation, but correlation alone cannot show which variable causes which, or whether a third factor drives both. In fact, at the end of ice ages slight changes in Earth’s orbit began the warming, and CO₂ released from the warming ocean then amplified it: CO₂ was both effect and cause. The evidence that today’s CO₂ rise causes warming comes from several independent lines:

  • Mechanism: laboratory measurements since the 1850s show CO₂ and CH₄ absorb infrared.
  • Fingerprint: the extra CO₂ has the isotope signature of fossil carbon (no ¹⁴C and relatively little ¹³C).
  • Pattern: the lower atmosphere is warming while the upper atmosphere cools, which fits more greenhouse gas, not a brighter Sun.

Global surface temperature in 2011–2020 averaged about 1.1 °C above 1850–1900, and 2024 was the warmest year on record, about 1.5 °C above.

Positive feedback in global warming

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.2

In positive feedback, a change sets off effects that increase that same change. Several processes in the climate system respond to warming by causing more warming, so the warming from our emissions is amplified.

Feedback How warming causes more warming
Loss of snow and ice Snow and ice reflect most sunlight (high albedo). As they melt, darker ocean, rock and vegetation are exposed and absorb more solar radiation.
Decomposition of peat and permafrost organic matter Permafrost is ground frozen for at least two years running. Dead organic matter in it has stayed undecomposed for thousands of years, because saprotrophs cannot act at low temperatures. As it thaws, and as peat warms, saprotrophs decompose it faster and release CO₂.
Methane from thawing permafrost Thawed soils are often waterlogged and anaerobic, so methanogens convert organic matter to methane, a more potent greenhouse gas.
CO₂ from the oceans Warm water dissolves less CO₂, and a warmer, more stratified surface layer mixes less with the deep ocean, so oceans absorb less of our emissions. Changes in ocean circulation can bring CO₂-rich deep water to the surface, where it degasses, as happened at the end of ice ages.
Droughts and forest fires Hotter, drier summers increase drought and the frequency and intensity of fires, which release CO₂ by combustion and leave less vegetation to absorb CO₂ by photosynthesis.

Permafrost soils hold roughly 1,400–1,600 billion tonnes of carbon, about twice as much as the atmosphere, which is why their thaw is a major concern.

Simulation Positive feedback loop explorer

Qualitative model. Warming is in relative units (1 = the warming emissions would cause with no feedback). Loop strengths and tipping points are invented to show how positive feedback behaves; they are not climate projections.

Total warming against warming caused directly by emissionsWith feedback loops switched on, total warming rises faster than the no-feedback line and jumps upward where a tipping point is passed.0.511.522.5301234567Warming caused directly by emissions (relative units)Total warming (relative units)permafrost tipping pointboreal forest tipping point
  • No feedback
  • With the loops switched on
  • Tipping point

Share of the total warming from each source

  • Direct 1.00
  • Snow and ice melt +0.13
  • Permafrost and peat +0.08
  • Drought and fire +0.05
  • Warmer oceans +0.07

Rounds of feedback (each round warms by a fraction of the one before)

Feedback loops
Total warming1.33
Amplification×1.33
Tipping points passed0

With all four loops on, direct warming of 1.0 unit becomes 1.33 units: feedback amplifies it 1.33 times. No tipping point has been passed.

Show data table
Total warming for the loops and strength selected (relative units)
Direct warmingTotal warmingAmplification
0.50.67×1.33
1.01.33×1.33
1.52.17×1.45
2.03.17×1.59
2.53.97×1.59
3.04.76×1.59
Text description of this simulation

A qualitative model of positive feedback in global warming, using relative units in which 1 is the warming that human emissions would cause with no feedback. Four loops can be switched on or off: melting snow and ice (less sunlight reflected), thawing permafrost and warming peat (decomposition releases CO₂ and, in waterlogged soil, methane), drought and fire in boreal forest (stored carbon burned), and warmer oceans (less CO₂ absorbed and some released). Each loop returns a fraction of the warming as extra warming, so the total equals the direct warming divided by one minus the sum of the loop strengths. A graph plots total warming against direct warming, beside a dashed no-feedback line; a stacked bar shows how much of today's total each loop adds; and a row of bars shows that each round of feedback adds less than the round before. The permafrost and boreal-forest loops have tipping points: when total warming crosses a threshold, the loop becomes stronger (widespread thaw; forest flips from carbon sink to carbon source) and warming jumps. Sliders set the direct warming and the strength of every loop, and preset buttons show no feedback, all loops at low emissions and a push past both tipping points. The strengths and thresholds are invented for illustration.

The feedbacks do not usually cause runaway warming: each round of feedback adds less than the round before, so warming settles at a higher level. But where a feedback becomes self-sustaining in one part of the system, a tipping point can be passed.

Boreal forests: a tipping point from sink to source

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.3

Boreal forest (taiga) stretches across Canada, Alaska, Scandinavia and Russia. It is dominated by conifers such as spruce, pine, fir and larch, and holds about a third of the carbon in the world’s forests, much of it in cold, slowly decomposing soils and peat. For thousands of years it has been a net carbon sink: photosynthesis exceeded respiration and combustion, so carbon accumulated.

How warming can flip it to a source

The high latitudes are warming roughly two to four times faster than the global average. In the taiga this brings:

  1. Warmer temperatures and less winter snow. Snow melts earlier, so less meltwater is stored in the soil for summer.
  2. Drought. Trees suffer water stress in hot, dry summers, and drought-weakened trees are more easily killed by insect pests.
  3. Lower primary production and browning. Satellite images show “browning”, a fall in green leaf cover, over large areas, as photosynthesis declines.
  4. More frequent and more intense fires. Drier fuel burns more often and more deeply.
  5. Combustion of legacy carbon. Deep organic soil layers that survived previous fires, storing carbon for decades or centuries, now burn too.

When losses from fire, respiration and decomposition exceed the carbon taken up by photosynthesis, the forest changes from net carbon accumulation to net carbon loss. Because that release causes more warming, which causes more fire and drought, the change can become self-reinforcing. Burned stands may regrow as broadleaf woodland or grassland that stores less carbon, so the system does not simply return to its old state.

This is an example of a tipping point: a threshold beyond which a small extra change shifts a system into a different state that is hard to reverse (tipping points are also discussed in D4.2 Stability and change). Canada’s record 2023 fire season burned more than 15 million hectares, and in some recent years boreal fires have released as much carbon as a large industrial country emits from fossil fuels.

Melting landfast ice and sea ice

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.4

Polar ice is a habitat: a solid platform on which animals rest, breed and reach their food. Two types matter here:

  • Landfast ice (fast ice) is sea ice frozen to the coast or to grounded icebergs, so it stays in place.
  • Sea ice (pack ice) floats freely and drifts with winds and currents.

Both are forming later, shrinking and breaking up earlier. The Arctic’s September sea-ice extent has fallen by roughly 13% per decade since satellite records began in 1979.

Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri): losing breeding grounds

Emperor penguins breed on landfast ice around Antarctica in the southern winter. Eggs are laid around May–June, incubated by the males on their feet, and the chicks need the ice to stay stable until about December–January, when they have grown waterproof adult feathers and can go to sea. If the fast ice breaks out early, chicks still covered in down fall into the sea and drown or freeze.

In 2022, record-low sea ice in the Bellingshausen Sea region led to total breeding failure at four of five colonies there, because the ice broke up before the chicks fledged. Models predict that most colonies could be lost by 2100 if warming continues at a high rate.

Walruses: losing sea-ice platforms

Walruses dive to feed on clams and other animals on the sea floor of shallow continental shelves. Females and calves rest on sea ice between dives, which lets them feed over wide areas far from land and keeps calves away from predators and crowds. In the Chukchi Sea, summer ice now often retreats beyond the shelf over water too deep to feed in, so walruses must haul out on beaches instead:

  • tens of thousands crowd together, and calves can be crushed when the herd stampedes;
  • they must make longer swims from shore to feeding areas, using more energy;
  • feeding grounds near the haul-out sites are depleted.

Ocean currents and nutrient upwelling

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.5

In the open ocean, mineral nutrients such as nitrate, phosphate and iron are quickly used up by phytoplankton in the sunlit surface layer. Dead organisms and faeces sink, so the nutrients accumulate in deep water, where there is too little light for photosynthesis.

Upwelling

In some places, winds and the Earth’s rotation push surface water away from a coast, and cold, nutrient-rich deep water rises to replace it. This upwelling supplies nutrients to the surface, so phytoplankton grow fast. High primary production supports large populations of zooplankton, fish (such as the Peruvian anchoveta), seabirds and marine mammals. Upwelling zones off Peru, California and south-west Africa cover only a small fraction of the ocean surface but yield a large share of the world’s fish catch.

How warming disrupts it

Warm water is less dense than cold water, so as the surface warms it floats more stably on top of the cold deep water. This stratification reduces mixing, and changes in winds and currents can alter the timing and strength of upwelling. The result:

warmer surface water → less upwelling of nutrients → less phytoplankton growth → lower primary production → less energy passed along marine food chains

A natural example shows the effect. During El Niño events, trade winds weaken and warm water spreads east across the Pacific, suppressing upwelling off Peru. In 1972–73 this contributed to the collapse of the anchoveta fishery, and seabird colonies that depend on the fish declined sharply.

Range shifts: poleward and upslope

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.6

Every species can survive only within its range of tolerance for temperature and other factors (B4.1 Adaptation to environment). As the climate warms, the zones with suitable conditions move towards the poles and up mountains (temperature falls with altitude). Populations at the warm edge of a range decline, while new populations can establish at the cool edge, so the range shifts. Animals do this by moving; plants do it through seed dispersal and differences in seedling survival.

Upslope and poleward range shiftsLeft: a mountain on Karkar Island, Papua New Guinea. A montane bird species' elevational range in 1969 is shown as a band; in 2013 the band sits higher up the slope. Across species, upper range limits moved upslope by about 152 metres on average. Right: eastern North American trees, comparing where seedlings grow with where adult trees grow. In a species shifting north, seedlings extend beyond the adults at the northern edge and are missing at the southern edge. In about 59% of 92 species the seedling range was narrower at both edges, a range contraction; about 21% showed a northward shift and about 16% a southward shift.Upslope: birds on Karkar Island, New Guinea060012001800elevation (m)range in 1969range in 2013Upper limits rose 152 m on average(species surveyed 1969, resurveyed 2013)Poleward: eastern North American treesWhere seedlings grow vs where adults growlatitude → northcontraction≈ 59%shift north≈ 21%shift south≈ 16%adultsseedlings92 species; north is up
Left: on Karkar Island, birds' upper elevation limits moved upslope by about 152 m on average between 1969 and 2013 (one species' range shown schematically). Right: in eastern North American trees, comparing seedling and adult ranges suggests contraction is more common than a northward shift.

Upslope: tropical montane birds in New Guinea

Researchers repeated bird surveys first carried out by Jared Diamond on mountains in Papua New Guinea. On Karkar Island (surveyed 1969, resurveyed 2013), the upper elevation limits of the montane species had moved upslope, by about 152 m on average. On Mount Karimui (1965 and 2012) upper limits rose by about 113 m. Tropical montane species often have narrow temperature tolerances, so they respond strongly. Species already near a summit have nowhere higher to go and may become extinct (A4.2 Conservation of biodiversity).

Poleward: North American trees

Trees cannot move, and they live for decades or centuries, so their ranges change slowly. A study of 92 tree species in the eastern USA compared where seedlings grow with where adult trees grow:

  • about 21% showed a northward spread (seedlings beyond adults in the north, absent in the south);
  • about 59% showed range contraction at both edges (seedlings failing at the southern edge but not yet spreading north);
  • about 16% shifted south.

Other studies show conifers tending to move north, while many broadleaf species have shifted west, perhaps following rainfall. Trees are often too slow to keep up with the speed of warming.

Coral reefs: a risk of ecosystem collapse

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.7

Tropical coral reefs are built by reef-building (hard) corals: colonies of small polyps that secrete skeletons of calcium carbonate (CaCO₃). Inside the polyps’ cells live zooxanthellae, photosynthetic algae that supply the coral with sugars, in a mutualism (C4.1 Populations and communities). Reefs cover far less than 1% of the sea floor but support roughly a quarter of all marine species. Rising CO₂ threatens them in two separate ways.

Ocean acidification and coral bleachingLeft: the chemistry of ocean acidification. Carbon dioxide from the air dissolves in sea water and reacts with water to form carbonic acid, which dissociates into hydrogen ions and hydrogen carbonate ions. The extra hydrogen ions combine with carbonate ions to form more hydrogen carbonate, so fewer carbonate ions are left for corals to combine with calcium ions to build calcium carbonate skeletons. Surface ocean pH has fallen from about 8.2 to about 8.1. Right: coral bleaching. A healthy coral polyp is coloured by many zooxanthellae, photosynthetic algae living in its cells. When water stays unusually warm for weeks, the coral expels the algae and turns white, exposing the skeleton; if the heat lasts, the starving coral dies.1. Ocean acidification — caused by more CO₂CO₂ in the atmosphereCO₂ + H₂O → H₂CO₃dissolved CO₂ forms carbonic acidH₂CO₃ → H⁺ + HCO₃⁻more H⁺ ions, so pH fallsH⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → HCO₃⁻H⁺ removes carbonate ionsCa²⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → CaCO₃calcification of the coral skeletonis slowed: fewer CO₃²⁻ availableSurface ocean pH ≈ 8.2 (1750) → ≈ 8.1 nowabout 30% more H⁺ (pH is a log scale)2. Bleaching — caused by heathealthybleachedzooxanthellae givecolour and sugarsalgae expelled; whiteskeleton shows throughheatTrigger: water ≥ 1 °C above the usualsummer maximum for several weeksCaCO₃ skeletonCorals are the reef's foundation species.Repeated bleaching and slowercalcification mean reefs erode faster thanthey grow: fish and invertebrates lose foodand shelter, and the ecosystem can collapse.
Two separate threats: ocean acidification (caused by dissolved CO₂) reduces carbonate ions and slows calcification; high temperature causes bleaching.

Ocean acidification: caused by increased CO₂

The oceans have absorbed roughly a quarter of the CO₂ emitted by humans. Dissolved CO₂ reacts with water:

CO₂ + H₂O → H₂CO₃ → H⁺ + HCO₃⁻

The extra hydrogen ions lower the pH, from about 8.2 before industrialization to about 8.1 now (about 30% more H⁺, because pH is a logarithmic scale). They also react with carbonate ions:

H⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → HCO₃⁻

Corals need carbonate ions to combine with calcium (Ca²⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → CaCO₃), so fewer carbonate ions means suppressed calcification: skeletons grow more slowly and are weaker, and if carbonate falls far enough, existing CaCO₃ starts to dissolve.

Bleaching: caused by high temperature

When water stays about 1 °C or more above the usual summer maximum for several weeks, the zooxanthellae are damaged and the corals expel them. The corals turn white (bleaching) and lose most of their food supply. If the heat passes quickly the algae can return, but long or repeated bleaching kills the corals. Mass bleaching events have become more frequent; the fourth global event began in 2023.

From coral loss to reef collapse

Corals are the foundation species of the reef: their skeletons create the three-dimensional structure that fish and invertebrates use for food, shelter and breeding. When corals die, the reef is overgrown by seaweed, erodes, and the community that depends on it collapses: a whole ecosystem is lost, not just one species.

Carbon sequestration: forests and peat

SL & HLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.8

Carbon sequestration means removing CO₂ from the atmosphere and storing it for a long time. Biological approaches use photosynthesis to build long-lasting carbon stores: wood in trees and peat in wetlands.

Approach What it means Points to evaluate
Afforestation Planting trees where there was no recent forest Stores carbon in wood and soil, but only suitable where forest is the natural vegetation; planting grassland, tundra or peat can destroy habitats or release soil carbon
Forest regeneration (reforestation) Allowing or helping forest to regrow where it was cleared Uses native species and existing seed banks, often cheaply; growth may be slower at first
Restoring peat-forming wetlands Blocking drains, raising the water table, replanting Sphagnum moss Stops CO₂ loss from drained peat quickly; new peat forms slowly; rewetting can briefly raise methane release

The plantation debate

Scientists actively debate the best approach:

  • Non-native plantations (e.g. Sitka spruce in Britain, eucalyptus or pine elsewhere) grow fast and sequester carbon quickly, and produce timber. But they are usually monocultures with low biodiversity, are vulnerable to pests and fire, and much of their carbon returns to the air if the wood is harvested and burned.
  • Rewilding with native species creates diverse, more resilient forests that support native wildlife and keep carbon stored for longer, though growth can be slower. Some argue that non-native species may be better suited to a warmer future climate.

Where peat forms

Peat forms where dead plant matter accumulates faster than it decomposes: in waterlogged soils, which are anaerobic and often acidic, so saprotrophs work very slowly. This happens in bogs and fens of the temperate and boreal zones, where peat builds up about a millimetre a year, and very rapidly in some tropical peat swamp forests, such as in South-East Asia and the Congo Basin. Peatlands cover only about 3% of the land but store roughly 600 billion tonnes of carbon, more than all the world’s forest vegetation.

Intact, drained and restored peatlandThree cross-sections of a peatland. Intact: the water table is near the surface, the peat is waterlogged and anaerobic, decomposition is very slow, plants absorb more CO₂ than is released and peat accumulates, so it is a carbon sink. Drained: the water table is lowered, air enters the peat, saprotrophs decompose it aerobically and release CO₂, and dry peat can burn, so it becomes a carbon source. Restored: drains are blocked, the water table rises again and Sphagnum moss is re-established, so peat formation and carbon storage can restart.Intact peatlandwater tablepeat accumulatesCO₂ absorbedwaterlogged → anaerobicdecomposition very slownet carbon SINKDrained peatlandwater tablepeat decomposesCO₂ releasedwater table lowered → aerobicsaprotrophs respire peat;fire risk → net carbon SOURCERestored (rewetted)water tablepeat forms againCO₂ absorbeddrains blocked, water raisedSphagnum moss replantedsink restored (slowly)
Peat stores carbon only while it stays waterlogged. Drainage lets air in, so the peat decomposes and becomes a carbon source; rewetting can restore the sink.

Phenology: timing of biological events

AHLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.9

Phenology is the study of the timing of seasonal events in living organisms and of the environmental cues that control them. Being active at the right time of year is crucial: flowering when pollinators are about, or rearing young when food is most plentiful.

Two main cues

Cue How it varies Events it often controls
Photoperiod (day length) Exactly the same each year at a given latitude; not affected by climate change bud set and leaf fall in many deciduous trees (shortening days in late summer); flowering in photoperiod-sensitive plants; migration and the start of nesting in many birds
Temperature Varies from year to year, and rises with climate change budburst in deciduous trees (after a cold winter, warm spring days trigger it); insect emergence and development; flowering in many spring plants; fine-tuning of egg-laying date in some birds

Many events use both cues. In some trees, for example, budburst needs a period of winter chilling, then a certain amount of spring warmth, and in beech a long enough day as well.

Phenology as evidence of climate change

Because photoperiod does not change, any trend in the dates of temperature-cued events reflects climate. Long records show it clearly: the first leaves of an official horse-chestnut tree in Geneva have been recorded since 1808, and the typical date has moved from around early April to around March, with some years far earlier. Across hundreds of species, spring events in the Northern Hemisphere have advanced on average by about 2–3 days per decade.

Climate change disrupts phenological synchrony

AHLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.10

Within an ecosystem, interacting species may respond to different cues. If one population uses temperature and another uses photoperiod, warming shifts one event but not the other, and species that were synchronized fall out of step.

Reindeer and Arctic mouse-ear chickweed

In West Greenland, reindeer (caribou, Rangifer tarandus) migrate to their calving grounds in spring, timed largely by photoperiod. Calving coincides with the spring growth of food plants such as Arctic mouse-ear chickweed (Cerastium arcticum), whose growth is triggered by temperature. As springs have warmed, plant growth has started earlier, but the reindeer have not arrived earlier. Females therefore meet plants past their most nutritious stage when they most need food to produce milk, and fewer calves survive.

Great tits and caterpillars

Great tits (Parus major) feed their chicks mainly on winter moth caterpillars, which are abundant on oak leaves for only a few weeks in spring. The caterpillar peak is driven by temperature (eggs hatch as oak buds open). The birds’ laying date is set largely by photoperiod, with only some response to temperature. At Hoge Veluwe in the Netherlands, warming since the 1980s has advanced the caterpillar peak much more than the laying date, so in many years the chicks need most food after the caterpillar peak has passed, and selection favours females that lay earlier.

Simulation Great tits and caterpillars out of stepAHL

Qualitative model based on the long-term great tit study at Hoge Veluwe, the Netherlands. Dates, rates and the success curve are illustrative, chosen so that birds and caterpillars match in the reference spring.

Caterpillar biomass and great tit chicks' food demand through springTwo bell-shaped curves: winter moth caterpillar biomass, and the food demand of great tit chicks. In the reference spring both peak on 20 May. Warming moves the caterpillar peak earlier faster than the birds' peak, opening a gap.1 Apr15 Apr1 May15 May1 Jun15 Jun30 Jun00.250.50.751DateRelative amountfirst egghatchingin step
  • Winter moth caterpillar biomass (temperature-cued)
  • Great tit chicks' food demand
  • Bird dates (cued mainly by day length)

Caterpillars advance about 6 days per °C. A bird population whose timing is set mostly by photoperiod responds less.

Caterpillar peak
20 May
Chicks' peak demand
20 May
Mismatch
in step
Fledglings per nest
7.5
Day length on first-egg date (52° N)
13 h 58 min

In the reference spring the chicks need most food on 20 May, exactly when caterpillars peak, so each nest fledges about 7.5 young.

Show data table
Peaks and mismatch for the selected bird response
Spring temperatureCaterpillar peakChicks' peak demandMismatchFledglings
-1 °C26 May22 May4 days early6.6
0 °C20 May20 Mayin step7.5
+1 °C14 May18 May4 days late6.6
+2 °C8 May16 May8 days late4.5
+3 °C2 May14 May12 days late2.4
Text description of this simulation

A qualitative model based on the long-term study of great tits (Parus major) at Hoge Veluwe in the Netherlands. The graph runs from 1 April to 30 June. A shaded bell-shaped curve shows winter moth caterpillar biomass, which peaks on 20 May in the reference spring; a dashed curve shows the food demand of great tit chicks, which peaks about 30 days after the first egg is laid (about 9 eggs at one a day, about 12 days of incubation, then about 9 days of chick growth). Markers show the first-egg date and hatching. In the reference spring both curves peak together. A spring temperature slider moves the caterpillar peak about 6 days earlier per °C, because caterpillar emergence follows oak budburst, which is triggered by temperature. A second slider sets how many days earlier per °C the birds lay; birds whose timing is set mainly by photoperiod respond weakly. A bracket and readouts show the mismatch in days, the expected fledglings per nest, which fall as the mismatch grows, and the day length on the first-egg date at 52° N. With a weak bird response a warm spring makes chicks hatch too late for the caterpillar peak; birds that tracked temperature as closely as the caterpillars would stay in step. All rates are illustrative.

Not every population is mismatched. In Wytham Woods, near Oxford, great tits have advanced their laying by about two weeks over five decades through phenotypic plasticity (responding to spring temperature) and have largely kept pace with the caterpillars.

More insect life cycles each year

AHLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.11

Insects are ectotherms: their rate of development depends on temperature. A life cycle needs a certain amount of accumulated warmth, so in warmer years each generation is completed faster, and the active season starts earlier and ends later. Some insects can therefore fit more generations into one year, greatly increasing their population growth rate.

Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus)

The European spruce bark beetle bores into spruce trees and breeds under the bark. Its larvae eat the phloem, cutting off the flow of sugars, and the beetles carry blue-stain fungi; mass attacks kill the tree.

Spruce bark beetle generations in cool and warm yearsTwo timelines from January to December for the European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. In a cool summer, adults that overwintered fly in late spring to bore into spruce, and their brood develops through the summer, giving one generation a year. In a warm summer, flight starts earlier and development is faster, so the first generation's adults emerge in summer and start a second generation before autumn, giving two generations a year and many more beetles to attack trees.JFMAMJJASONDCool summerone generationadults overwintergeneration 1 developsoverwinterWarm summertwo generationsadults overwintergeneration 1generation 2overwinteroverwintering adultsflight (swarming) to new spruceegg → larva → pupa → adult
Schematic timing of the spruce bark beetle. Warmth brings the spring flight forward and speeds up development, allowing a second generation in the same year.
  • Adults overwinter and fly to new trees in spring when the air warms to about 16–17 °C.
  • One generation, from egg to adult, needs roughly 550 degree-days above about 8 °C.
  • In cool northern or upland forests this allowed only one generation a year. In warm summers, populations in southern Scandinavia now complete two, and in lowland central Europe sometimes three.

At the same time, drought weakens spruce trees, which produce less resin to defend themselves. More beetles attacking weaker trees caused huge outbreaks: after the hot, dry summers of 2018–2020, beetles killed spruce over vast areas of central Europe, especially in the Czech Republic and Germany. Dead forest stores less carbon, linking back to positive feedback.

The great spruce bark beetle (Dendroctonus micans) normally takes one to two years per generation; warmer conditions shorten its development too. In North America, the related spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) switched from a two-year to a one-year life cycle in warm years, contributing to outbreaks in Alaska.

Evolution as a consequence of climate change

AHLSyllabus understandings: D4.3.12

Climate change alters the environment, so it can alter which heritable variants survive and reproduce best. When that changes allele frequencies in a population, it is evolution by natural selection (A4.1 Evolution and speciation).

Tawny owls (Strix aluco) in Finland

Tawny owls occur in two main colour variants (morphs): grey and brown. Plumage colour is strongly heritable, and the brown allele is dominant over the grey allele. Finland is near the northern edge of the species’ range.

  • In cold winters with deep snow, grey owls survive better than brown ones, possibly because they are better camouflaged against snow or cope better with cold. Snow-rich winters therefore select against the brown variant.
  • As winters in Finland have become milder with less snow cover, this selection has weakened, so the relative fitness of brown owls has risen.
  • Long-term records showed the proportion of brown owls increasing markedly, both in a study population followed for about 28 years and in Finland as a whole over about 48 years.
Snowy winters (past) Milder winters, less snow (now)
Grey morph better survival survival similar to brown
Brown morph selected against selection relaxed; frequency rising

This is evidence that climate change is causing a genetic change in a wild population, not just a change in behaviour.

Must-know definitions

Greenhouse effect
Short-wave solar radiation passes through the atmosphere and warms the surface; the surface emits long-wave infrared, part of which is absorbed and re-emitted back down by greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, H2O, N2O). The natural effect keeps the mean surface temperature near +15 °C instead of about −18 °C.
Enhanced greenhouse effect
Extra warming caused by human-caused rises in greenhouse-gas concentrations: CO2 from about 280 ppm before industrialization to about 425 ppm in 2024, mainly from burning fossil fuels and deforestation; CH4 more than doubled, from livestock, rice paddies, landfill and fossil-fuel leaks.
Positive feedback
A process in which a change causes effects that increase that same change, so it is amplified. In global warming, warming causes snow and ice loss, permafrost thaw, fires and reduced ocean CO2 uptake, each of which causes more warming.
Tipping point
A threshold beyond which a small further change pushes a system into a new state through self-reinforcing feedback, and the change is hard or impossible to reverse. Example: boreal forest changing from net carbon accumulation (sink) to net carbon loss (source).
Legacy carbon
Carbon stored for decades to centuries in the deep organic soil layers of boreal forest that survived earlier fires. More frequent, intense fires now burn it, releasing CO2 that had been locked away.
Ocean acidification
CO2 + H2O → H2CO3 → H+ + HCO3−; the extra H+ combines with carbonate (H+ + CO32− → HCO3−), so less carbonate is available for corals to make CaCO3. Surface pH has fallen from about 8.2 to about 8.1.
Coral bleaching
Loss of the photosynthetic zooxanthellae from coral tissue when water stays unusually warm for weeks, leaving the coral white and starved of sugars. Prolonged or repeated bleaching kills corals.
Carbon sequestration
Capture of CO2 from the atmosphere and its long-term storage, biologically in tree biomass (afforestation, forest regeneration) and in peat that forms in waterlogged, anaerobic soils.
PhenologyAHL
The study of the timing of seasonal biological events, such as budburst, bud set, flowering, migration and nesting, and of the cues (mainly photoperiod and temperature) that trigger them.
Phenological mismatchAHL
Loss of synchrony between interacting species when warming shifts a temperature-cued event (e.g. the caterpillar peak, plant growth) but not a photoperiod-cued one (e.g. great tit breeding, reindeer arrival).
Evolution caused by climate changeAHL
A change in allele frequency because climate change alters which heritable variants survive and reproduce best. In tawny owls, less snow has weakened selection against the brown colour variant, so its frequency has risen.

Common exam mistakes

  • Loses marks The hole in the ozone layer causes global warming.

    Write instead Ozone depletion lets more ultraviolet reach the surface (more skin cancer). Global warming is caused by greenhouse gases absorbing and re-emitting infrared. They are separate problems with different causes.

  • Loses marks The greenhouse effect is harmful and caused by humans.

    Write instead The natural greenhouse effect is essential: without it the mean surface temperature would be about −18 °C. The problem is the enhanced greenhouse effect caused by human emissions.

  • Loses marks Greenhouse gases trap the sunlight coming in from the Sun.

    Write instead Greenhouse gases are largely transparent to incoming short-wave radiation. They absorb the long-wave infrared emitted by the warmed surface and re-emit some back towards it.

  • Loses marks Positive feedback means the effect is good for the environment.

    Write instead 'Positive' means the response amplifies the original change. Positive feedback in global warming makes warming worse.

  • Loses marks Because ice-core CO2 and temperature are correlated, the ice cores prove that CO2 causes warming.

    Write instead Correlation alone does not show cause. The causal link rests on other evidence: the measured absorption of infrared by CO2, the isotopic signature of fossil carbon in the air, and the pattern of warming.

  • Loses marks Coral bleaching is caused by ocean acidification.

    Write instead Bleaching is caused mainly by high water temperature, which makes corals expel their zooxanthellae. Acidification is a separate effect of CO2 that reduces carbonate availability and slows calcification.

  • Loses marks Planting any trees anywhere is always a good way to fight climate change.

    Write instead Afforestation must be evaluated: plantations on natural grassland or drained peat can destroy habitats or release more carbon than they store, and non-native monocultures support less biodiversity. Restoring peat and native forest can be better.

  • Loses marks Species move poleward because they choose to migrate away from the heat.

    Write instead Range shifts happen through differences in survival and reproduction: populations decline at the warm edge and new populations establish at the cool edge, for example through seedlings surviving further north or upslope.

  • Loses marks Birds lay later than the caterpillar peak because they are getting slower to respond.

    Write instead Great tit breeding is cued largely by photoperiod, which climate change does not alter, while the caterpillar peak follows temperature. Warming advances the caterpillar peak more, so chicks hatch after it.

    AHL
  • Loses marks Tawny owls turn brown because the snow has disappeared.

    Write instead Individual owls do not change colour in response. Colour is heritable; milder, less snowy winters have changed the relative fitness of grey and brown owls, so natural selection has increased the frequency of the brown variant.

    AHL

Self-test

Answer the questions, then check. Your best score and the flashcards you know are saved in this browser only.

Multiple-choice questions

  1. Question 1Atmospheric CO₂ has risen from about 280 ppm to about 425 ppm since 1750. Which statement explains how this rise warms the Earth's surface?
  2. Question 2Which sequence is an example of positive feedback in global warming?
  3. Question 3Boreal forest has accumulated carbon for thousands of years. Which change would show that a tipping point had been passed, turning it into a net carbon source?
  4. Question 4CO₂ + H₂O → H₂CO₃ → H⁺ + HCO₃⁻ and H⁺ + CO₃²⁻ → HCO₃⁻. Using these equations, why does more dissolved CO₂ suppress calcification by reef-building corals?
  5. Question 5In 1969 a montane bird species on Karkar Island, New Guinea, was recorded between 600 m and 900 m. In 2013 it was recorded between 740 m and 1,060 m. Which conclusion is best supported?
  6. Question 6Why does early break-out of landfast ice threaten emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri)?
  7. Question 7AHLIn a long-term study in a north European forest (illustrative data), the peak of winter moth caterpillars advanced by about 15 days over several decades, while the mean laying date of great tits advanced by about 5 days. What is the most likely explanation and consequence?
  8. Question 8AHLWhich phenological event in deciduous trees is triggered mainly by a change in photoperiod?
  9. Question 9AHLIn parts of southern Scandinavia, the spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) used to complete one generation a year but now often completes two. Which explanation is correct?
  10. Question 10AHLIn Finland, the proportion of brown tawny owls (Strix aluco) has risen as winters have become less snowy. Why is this described as evolution?

Flashcards

Say the answer to yourself, then reveal it. Mark Got it or Again; cards you've got move to the back of the deck.

Prompt

Outline the greenhouse effect.

Last reviewed 19 October 2026. Spotted a mistake? Report it.

Type at least 2 letters.